Improve Eyesight and Optimal Eye Health Naturally

Naturally improve eyesight and throw away your glasses. Vision training eye exercises and key nutrients have helped thousands of people improve vision naturally. Rebuild Your Vision.

::Improve Eyesight Naturally::

Wouldn't you like to improve eyesight and see without your glasses or contact lenses without going through eye surgery?

Eye exercises improved my eyesight. I have lowered my eye-glass prescription and my eyesight have never gotten worse.

"After I've tried out this AMAZING program, I have improved my eyesight and now I can see without glasses."

Check out my story:

When I was in grade 6, my eyes began to be slightly blurry. After checking up with my optometrist, I found that I was nearsighted and he prescribed me a pair of glasses. From then on, I've gotten used to wearing glasses everyday, and have always increased my prescription.

I didn't really like paying for new expensive lenses every single year so I asked my optometrist if there is any way to improve eyesight, or at least stop the progression of my deteriorating vision.

He said no, "there is no way to improve eyesight". He had the title "Doctor" before his name. So, I believed him.

But later I found that it was a just a BIG LIE to sell me new glasses and lenses.

I've found this program and tried it out RISK FREE and

"after about one month, my prescription was significantly lowered and I had to get new glasses to accommodate for my better vision."

Just like how your arms get stronger by doing arm exercises, there are specific eye exercises that makes your eyes stronger, so that you can see better.

Eye exercises not only cures nearsightedness, but also improves the following eye problems:

• Nearsightedness (Myopia)
  
  
• Farsightedness (Hyperopia)
  
  
• Astigmatism
  
  
• Aging vision (Presbyopia)
  

The program I've found is called Rebuild Your Vision. Believe me, I've tried many, many programs and exercises in attempt to restore my vision. So, at first, I was hesitant to try this out. I've only gave in to Rebuild Your Vision because of its improve eyesight guarantee and no questions money back policy. And, boy am I glad I did. This program gives you step by step, detailed instructions that guides you to improve eyesight until you reach 20-20 vision. And the purpose of this website is to spread the word. I've already been there and have suffered the consequences of wearing glasses, and I know how you feel. I remember the feeling when I...

• Got hit by a soccer ball and the nose piece stabbed into my eye
  
• Not being able to see in the swimming pool
  
• Wasting time trying to find my glasses
  
• Losing money in order to replace broken frame
  
• I can go on and on...
  

During those days, oh how I desperately wanted to improve eyesight. Well, I am here to help those who was as miserable as I am.

Without any further due, let me introduce you to my website contents so that I can guide you towards the BIG DAY when you can finally grab your glasses or contact lenses with index finger and thumb, and slowly remove them from your head, permanently.

Go to Rebuild Your Vision.

Boreal Ecology Article Review: "Lowland boreal forests characterization in Algonquin Provincial Park relative to beaver (Castor Canadensis) foraging and edaphic factors"

This is a review for the article: "Lowland boreal forests characterization in Algonquin Provincial Park relative to beaver (Castor Canadensis) foraging and edaphic factors".

Noble, T. Donkor is associated with the department of Renewable Resources in University of Alberta, and is currently (year 2009) a professor in the Biology Department of Canadian University College.

This paper covers a research done in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada, that studied the combined effects of herbivory by beavers and edaphic conditions on woody plant community structure of lowland boreal forests that surrounds beaver ponds. 16 beaver ponds were studied (one being control with beaver absence) and analyzed for soil moisture and nutrient content relative to its distance from the pond, the number of certain saplings also relative to the distance, and the different species that was present also distance related. The results showed that herbivory decreased with increased distance from the pond, soil moisture decreased with increased distance, intermediate distance showed highest level of richness in woody plant species, mesic species decreased with distance while xeric species increased with distance, and nutrient content (ie. phosphate, magnesium and organic content) did not vary consistently with distance.

The major strength of this paper is that it is put in an unsophisticated manner– though the experiment requires complicated procedures it is interpreted into a simple and accurate data, which is straightforward and consistent. The weaknesses of this paper are its generalizations and assumptions – for example, the precise number of beavers in different ponds should have been recorded in the paper for detailed comparison along with the average measurements. Also, assuming that beaver’s preferred woody species should be more abundant with increased distance from the ponds (pg 6) should not have been made since the species live in different soil-moisture levels, which vary with distance – number of species that cannot tolerate drier soils will decrease with increased distance. Overall, the experiment done in this paper gives an excellent general view of the effects of the factors that were tested and increased my understanding of the boreal forests in relation to ponds.

Boreal Ecology Article Review: "Testing hypotheses of trophic level interactions: a boreal forest ecosystem"

This is a review for the article: "Testing hypotheses of trophic level interactions: a boreal forest ecosystem".

A. R. E. Sinclair is associated with the Centre for Biodiversity Research in University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

This paper describes an experiment done in boreal forest ecosystem at Kluane, Yukon, for a period of approximately 10 years, to determine whether the trophic level interaction follows the bottom-up hypothesis or the top-down hypothesis. Two types of experiments were done to test the hypotheses – addition and removal experiments – where they tested the direct and indirect effects of adding certain factors (fertilizer, hare food) and effects of removing certain factors (predator, hare, vegetation), and effects of adding and removing simultaneously to test the double effects. The results indicated that top-down hypothesis had a stronger direct effect on the trophic level interaction where predators of higher trophic level controlled the quantity of their prey.

The major strength of this paper is its thorough experimentation, where they analyzed many different crucial aspects of direct and indirect effects, as well as the double effects of addition and removal of factors – which requires a high level of knowledge and a broad range of view, which they used to form logical conclusions. The weakness of this paper is in the procedures – if there was any level of wind, it may have moved the fertilizers during the air-distribution if they were not extremely careful; another weakness is that the length of this experiment was not long enough to observe the full extent of the indirect effects. Regardless, the experiment has taken a step from looking at the hypotheses at a theory level to the actual real-life view.

This paper fits well with the course context since it analyzes the interaction between trophic levels in the boreal forest specifically (since the top-down hypotheses may not apply to other episodes). This reading helped understand the direct and indirect significance of predator-prey interactions in the boreal forest and both bottom-up and top-down hypotheses, and what must happen in order to make the hypothesis true.

Source Cited:

 “Testing hypotheses of trophic level interactions: a boreal forest ecosystem,” A. R. E. Sinclair, et al, 89:313-328, 2000.